it does not advise your clients
shandy drafts recommendations from what you and your client have discussed. deciding whether a recommendation is suitable is regulated work, and it stays with the adviser whose name is on it.
a note taker gives you a transcript and leaves the rest on your desk. shandy takes the conversation and finishes the work it creates: the summary, the follow ups, the document, the form, the reply, and the answer to whatever you need to know next week.
each capability below works on its own, and all six work from the same client record. that is the point. the summary informs the document, the document informs the email, and the email informs the answer you get when you ask what is outstanding.
shandy joins the video call, dials in on the phone, or takes a voice note you record on the way back to the office. it listens, separates the substance from the small talk, and produces a write up in the structure your firm expects: what was discussed, what was decided, what was agreed and what remains open.
the summary is attached to the client, not filed in a folder somewhere. and every line of it stays traceable to the moment in the conversation it came from, so if a point is ever questioned, the answer is one click away rather than one argument away.
it is not a recording you have to listen back to, and it is not a transcript you have to edit into something usable. the write up is the deliverable.
most of what goes wrong in a practice is not a bad decision. it is a small commitment made in passing at the end of a long call, never written down, and quietly missed. confirm the beneficiary. re-run the questionnaire. send the revised schedule before the next meeting.
shandy lifts each of those out of the conversation as it happens and turns it into a task with the client attached and the exact point in the call recorded against it. when you open the task a week later, you do not have to reconstruct why it exists.
the reason most generated documents are useless is that they read like they came from somewhere else. the headings are wrong, the tone is wrong, and the disclosures are in the wrong order, so rewriting the draft costs more than starting from the blank page.
shandy drafts into the templates your firm already uses, in the voice you already write in, with the structure your compliance function already approved. it pulls the substance from the record: what the client said, what you recommended, what the questionnaire returned, what changed since the last review.
what comes back is a genuine first draft. you read it, you change what needs changing, and you sign it off. the judgement is still entirely yours, which is the only arrangement that makes sense when your name is on the document.
a client's name, date of birth, address, employment, dependants and risk profile do not change between forms. only the layout does. shandy completes a form from what it already holds in the record, which removes both the typing and the transposition error that eventually comes with it.
control matters more than convenience here, so the firm decides field by field. some fields shandy populates. some are fixed by the firm and cannot be touched. some are deliberately left empty because they require a person to make a decision. that configuration belongs to the practice, not to the adviser filling in the form at five in the afternoon.
if every adviser can decide what gets filled in automatically, the firm has no consistent position to stand behind. setting it centrally means one answer to the question of how a form was completed, across the whole practice.
most of what a client tells you between meetings arrives by email, and most of what you promised them is somewhere in a thread three weeks deep. an assistant that cannot see the inbox is working with one eye closed.
connect your mailbox and shandy drafts client emails when you ask for them, in the register you already use with that particular client. the same history informs everything else it writes, so a review draft knows about the question the client asked by email on a tuesday evening.
nothing leaves your mailbox without you pressing send.
you have a client call in four minutes and you need to know what you agreed in february, whether the beneficiary question was ever closed, and what the last review recommended. that is three searches across three systems, or one question.
shandy answers in plain language and shows you where each part of the answer came from. then, in the same place, you can tell it what to do next: draft the review, write the email, complete the form. asking and acting are the same conversation.
what shandy
deliberately will not do.
a tool that hides its limits is harder to trust than one that states them. these are not features we have not built yet. they are decisions about where an assistant should stop in a regulated, advised relationship.
it does not give advice. it does not send on your behalf. it does not learn from your clients' data. it does not decide what your firm's position is.
shandy drafts recommendations from what you and your client have discussed. deciding whether a recommendation is suitable is regulated work, and it stays with the adviser whose name is on it.
no email, document or form leaves your hands automatically. every output arrives as a draft, and the act of sending is always a person's decision.
your client data is not used to train ai models and is not sold. it is held to do your firm's work and nothing else. the detail is on the security page.
templates, fixed fields, permissions and retention are set by the practice. shandy works inside those rules rather than negotiating with each adviser about them.
the fastest way to judge shandy is to put your next client conversation through it. onboarding is self service and free to start, so that can happen this week rather than next quarter.